|
|
You're in Chapter VI of...

 |
Thank you for the opportunity
to benchmark CUNA Mutual's RM
programs and projects in Great
Britain and Ireland.
I began benchmarking 90 days
prior to landing in Birmingham
with online surveys asking for
input from CUNA Mutual personnel
and credit unions in Great
Britain (England, Scotland,
Wales) and Ireland (North and
South). Thirty
days prior to landing in
Birmingham I published an
online workbook we subsequently used to
guide us through the
benchmarking process. We
assessed the administration, the tools we use
to collect risk and exposure
information (data sheets, memos
to file, surveys, etc.), written
and oral communications with
CUNA Mutual customers (written
reports, follow-up and telephone
consultations), and the status
of RM workshops and
presentations (power point
presentations, handouts, etc.).
Chapters II of the workbook was
used to teach how
to conduct RM research on the
internet. And, chapter V was
used to roll-out CUNA Mutual's
Incident Command and Control
System for 2007.
I've written a separate report
on my findings,
to include recommended process
improvements, for chapters
I (administration), III (data
sheets and written reports), and
IV (RM workshops and
Presentations).
Click on the
icons below to read the workbook
and a detailed report on each
chapter.
Per your request, I have also
summarize my findings, opinions,
and
recommended process improvements
for 2007. Because of the length
of this summary, I've included
an interactive table of contents
you can use to navigate my
reports.
This year's workbook has
six chapters. In
Chapter I, we
survey CUNA Mutual and
Credit Union Risk Managers to
"benchmark" our 2006 RM
programs and projects. In
Chapter II, we
retrain and introduce
alternative RM research and
development (R&D) strategies
for 2007. In
Chapter III, we
update RMA data sheets and
review written
reports to ensure we're
supporting CM underwriting and
claims personnel and our
recommendations are being
implemented at the credit union
level.
Chapter
IV, we refresh our RM
workshops and presentations and
plan for a series of 2007 RM discussions and
fireside chats with our Credit
Union Risk Managers. In
Chapter V,
we
take advanced training in CUNA Mutual's
Unified
Incident Command and Control
System. This system adopts the
"Incident Command System (ICS)
and National Incident Management
System (NIMS) required teaching
for law enforcement, fire
fighters, and emergency
governments to the credit union
movement. You are in
Chapter VI used to file a summary
report on benchmarking 2006. Use the interactive table of contents
below to navigate my report.
Note:
I often receive significant input after I've been in country so,
during the weeks following in-country benchmarking, I might be
posting additional comments and conclusions to my initial reports.
If so, I'll email a notice of summary updates.
Rich Woldt |
|
|

Thank
you CUNA Mutual for the
opportunity to benchmark your
Risk Management programs and
projects in Great Britain and
the island of Ireland.
I thank
Steve Finnigan, Gordon Bacon,
and John Hamilton for their
input, help and support during
this benchmarking project for
2006.
Their
Risk Management savvy is
commendable and their
administrative skills are the
reason credit union' risks are
so well managed in Great Britain
and the island of Ireland. It
was my privilege and
pleasure to work with them all again
this year. Rich
Woldt |
|
|
|
Interactive Table of Contents
- (Point
and click on topics - or point
and hold down Ctrl and Click)
A benchmarking "Mission
Statement" for 2996...
A report on RM projects
progress...
A suggested RM project "Mission
Statement" for 2007...
A suggested RM Strategic Action
Plan for 2007...
The benefits of "Security
Integration" and "Convergence"
at the credit union and chapter
levels...
Risk Management Process
Improvement for 2007...
A better way to use "Cash Item
Guidelines" in 2007...
A better approach to customizing
data sheets...
The need to prioritize risks in
Great Britain and Ireland
"separately".
Why embezzlement risks in
Ireland are going up, and up,
and up...
Using "fireside chats" to manage
risks, create opportunities, and
market CM products and
services...
|
Benchmarking Mission Statement
December 2006:
First... I will
benchmark the RM programs in
England, Scotland, Wales, and
Ireland.
Second...I will
create a way to safely collect,
securely store, and efficiently
analyze RM risk and exposure
information via the internet so
hard copy data sheets can be
eliminated. (This will allow
all Risk Management personnel to
enter data anytime and from
anywhere. It will also allow CMG
personnel in Madison Wisconsin,
Birmingham England, and Dublin
Ireland to simultaneously access
and evaluate RMA data collected
by frontline CMG personnel.)
Third...
I
will
develop an online RM
manual and tutorials to
facilitate RM training,
cross-training, and sharing of
RM research.
Fourth...I will
design and promote a Credit
Union Unified Incident Command
and Control System (CU-ICS) to
teach "convergence" and promotes
the formation of
public-to-private partnerships
needed most when a community or
country is threatened by a
natural disaster, terrorist
attack, or pandemic.
Fifth... I
will organize a Credit
Union Incident Response Team
(CIRT) that can be used as a
role-model in the credit union
movement and CUNA Mutual Group.
The CIRT will adhere to
internationally recognized ICS
and NIMS policies, procedures,
and protocols.
Sixth...I will submit
a suggested mission statement
and strategic action plan for
the RM project managers at CUNA
Mutual Group - International.
|
A report on RM projects and
progress -
December 20, 2006: |
|
This year, program
administration deserves a B+
up from it's C rating in
2004. In 2006, Steve developed
alternative ways to record,
store and analyze risk and
exposure information. For
example, he now uses his digital
camera to photograph safes,
vaults, and alarm components and
plans to get a video cell phone
next year. He's also created a
number of excel spread sheets
and email puddles to measure
burglary and robbery risks at
each credit union in the Great
Britain and Ireland.
On the downside, most
on-site RM analysis done in 2006
focused on burglary and robbery,
and not on the internal control,
fidelity, forgery or fraudulent
deposit analyses. While burglary
and especially robbery will
continue to need regular
attention, in my opinion, CUNA
Mutual's next big claim will be
an embezzlement claim coming out
of Ireland.
I strongly recommend Steve
quickly train John to do the
internal control, fidelity,
forgery and fraudulent deposit
analyses and make those the
focus during 2007. Needless to
say, in Dublin especially we
need to continue talking about
the risk of robbery.
CUNA Mutual's RM project budgets
followed the same program
development model used by the
Department of Homeland Security
and emergency governments.
In '03 and "04 we focused on
getting appropriate physical,
alarm, surveillance, and access
security in place based on the
cash item exposures in each
bonded credit union. Our
presentations focused on basic
RM principles and methods
(Identify, Measure, Control, -
Avoid, Reduce, Spread, Assume,
and Transfer to CUNA Mutual). In
'05 and '06 we focused on
training a cadre of CUNA Mutual
and Credit Union Risk Managers
in each CUNA Mutual market. RM
disciplines we taught included
creating controllable crime
scenes, defendable zones,
contingency planning, business
resumption, succession
management and integrating
security systems.
In my opinion, these CUNA
Mutual RM projects have been
focused and "right on target!"
In
2007, the operative RM
discipline will be
system "Convergence" and
the strategy will be
creating RM partnerships
at all levels of the
credit union movement
and public-to-private
partnerships at the
local and regional
levels. Without
a doubt forming
public-to-private RM
partnerships has
recommended RM solution
at every conference on
natural disasters,
terrorism and pandemics.
We've learned all three
can devestate an
economy.
|
Suggested
Risk Management Mission
Statements for 2007
In 2007 we will...
move from hard copy data sheets
to e-based data sheets so they
can be more easily accessed by
authorized CMG personnel to
include Madison Wisconsin based
underwriters and claims
personnel.
We will..
maintain RM files by postal
codes and transmit survey data
using "key" codes to enhance
security.
We will...
promote the latest RM methods to
include security integration and
convergence at the credit union,
chapter, regional, country, and
international levels.
We will...
write a CMG Incident Command and
Control response and recovery
plan and form a CUNA
Mutual/Credit Union Incident
Response Team (CIRT) for the
Midland East and Midland West
credit union chapters that serve
credit unions in the Birmingham
England and surrounding area and
the chapters that serve credit
unions in the Greater London
area.
Suggested
Risk Management Strategic Action
Plans for 2007
Strategic Action
Plans for 2007
should include
the following:
-
During
January,
create excel
spread
sheets
logging
credit
unions by
postal code,
bond
contract
number, ID
#, and
column for a
key code!
-
During first
quarter,
customize
www.surveymonkey.com
customer
surveys for
England,
Scotland,
Wales, and
Ireland!
-
During first
quarter,
create a two
hour RM
program to
be used
during a
"fireside"
chat session
on the
CU-ICS!
-
During the
second
quarter,
create
customer
surveys to
replace the
burglary,
robbery,
internal
control,
forgery, and
fidelity
risk
analyses.
-
During the
second
quarter,
create an RM
R&D library
of web sites
for doing
postal code
specific
crime
analysis.
Cross train
CMG
personnel on
how to use
the internet
to create
current
statistics
for chapter
presentations.
-
During the
second
quarter, use
the chapters
around
Birmingham
as a
template to
create a
CU-ICS!
-
During the
second
quarter,
organize a
CIRT for the
two chapters
serving the
Birmingham
area.
-
Conduct a
series of
"fireside"
chats on a
chapter
basis during
the second
and third
quarter so
to be ready
for
benchmarking
during the
first week
of November
each year.
-
Introduce
"convergence"
and
"security
integration"
at the
chapter
level..
|

Above:
Steve
Finnigan
and
Isabel
Shakespeare,
General
Manager
of
CitySave
Credit
Union at
16
Waterloo
Street
in
Birmingham
England
B25U,
discuss
the
evacuation
plans
recommended
by the
City of
Birmingham
authorities.
|
|
 |
Above - Right:
Isabel
Shakespeare
explains to
Steve how her
chapter (Midland
East?) and
Steve's chapter
(Midland West?)
compare to the
evacuation plan
recommended by
Birmingham
authorities. Go
to
www.birminghamalert.co.uk
for an excellent
example of city
emergency
government web
sites. Note how
the ABCUL web
site at
www.abcul.org
and the Citysave
CU at
www.citysave.org.uk
use postal codes
to track
locations and
maping.
Combining such
web sites using
postal codes
would be an
example of
"convergence."
Creating a
"unified" credit
union incident
command to
evacuate
Birmingham using
one of the many
GPS programs is
another example
of
"convergence."
Rich Woldt
|
|
The Incident
Command System
provides an
ideal template
for teaching
Risk
Management.
For
example, the Operations
Chief forms
burglary,
robbery, fire,
and medical
emergency teams
and teach them
to assess credit
union
operational
risks. The
Planning Chief
teaches
contingency
planning, the
Logistics Chief
teaches site
security, how to
create
controllable
crime scenes and
defendable
zones, and the
Finance Chief
teaches how to
establish and
consistently
adhere to proper
internal, audit,
and collection
controls.
Staging area
managers teach
how to set up
and manage
responding
resources. The
Safety officer
is one of the
most important
positions.
He/she makes
sure that credit
union personnel
are properly
equipped and
trained before
being deployed
to the hot zone.
The Information
officer makes
sure the credit
union speaks
with one voice
and the Liaison
Officer makes
sure no one gets
lost in the
confusion. Oh
yes! The
Incident
Commander
teaches how to
take command and
control over an
incident that
left alone will
spiral out of
control. Rich Woldt
|

The Credit Union
Incident Command System
(CU-ICS) is staffed by a
trained "Credit Union
Incident Response Team"
(CIRTs). You's called up
by the Incident
Commander will depend on
the type, scope, and
duration, of the
incident. Who takes part
depends on who's
willing, able, trained
and prepared to respond.
Click here for a
tutorial on forming your
CIRT... |
|
|
|
Risk Management Process
Improvement for 2007:
Risk Management Process
Improvement for 2007 - The
Benefits from Benchmarking 2006
Benchmarking in December 2006 confirmed
CUNA Mutual is on target based
on past RM mission statements,
AIMs, and strategic action
plans. However, there is an
urgent need to increase the
speed at which Risk Managers are
doing their RM research and
development of new RM methods
specifically in the area of
internet fraud, internal
dishonesty/embezzlement,
organized crime to include gang
MOs, and the known terrorist
threats to disrupt regional
economies. There is
also an urgent need to adjust
the focus of on-site risk
assessments so more attention is
given to embezzlement, external
frauds, scams, internet crimes
including phishing at credit
unions during mergers, and risks
associated with the new
liquidity management tools being
introduced in Great Britain and
Ireland, i.e. debit and/or credit cards.
There is also an urgent need to
introduce a CU Incident
Management System at the credit
union and chapter levels
to reduce losses that escalate
during and after a natural
disaster. Risk Management
Analysis need to be converted
from hard copy to an internet
based system that's properly
secured so it can be sorted,
analyzed, and shared with any
authorized CMG underwriter,
claims adjuster, account
relationship manager, and Risk
Manager.
Implementing the recommendations
in this report will..
- Expand the cadre of
CUNA Mutual Risk Managers in
Great Britain and Ireland
from two (Steve Finnigan
and John Hamilton) to two
plus all CUNA Mutual
personnel serving this
market.
- Provide 2007 Risk
Managers with 24/7 internet
access so they'll be able to
access risk analysis data
sheets, customer surveys,
and excel spread sheets set
up to sort, identify, and
measure risks by postal
code.
Click here for
a sample survey and
click here for
a sample survey assessment
tool.
If these links don't work
try the colored icons below
or in chapter I of the
workbook.
- CUNA Mutual Risk
Managers in 2007 will be
able to submit risk and
exposure information as well
as incident reports from any
where at any time via the
internet.
- CUNA Mutual'
underwriters, claims
personnel, Risk Managers,
and project supervisors will
be able to obtain the most
current risk and exposure
information on file at the
moment.
- Once risk and exposure
information has been logged
onto excel spread sheets,
Risk Managers will be able
to focus their RM workshops,
presentations, and fireside
chats where CUNA Mutual has
the greatest exposure
concentrations.
- In summary, implementing
process improvements from
benchmarking 2006 will make
CUNA Mutual RM programs and
projects more affective,
more efficient, and more
focused on the best interest
of the credit union movement
in Great Britain and
Ireland.
-
This survey is for CUNA
Mutual support personnel
or those who need to
rely on back office RM
project record keeping!
Following is an icon
with a link to be used
if you want to email the
survey to CUNA Mutual
personnel.
 |
This survey is for CUNA
Mutual Account
Representatives, CUNA
Mutual Risk Managers,
CUNA Mutual
Underwriters, and CUNA
Mutual Claims Personnel.
It's purpose is to
determine how beneficial
RMA data sheets and
written reports have
been to you during 2006. |
This survey is for CUNA
Mutual customers to
include bond holders and
those who CUNA Mutual
Risk Managers partnered
with during 2006.
Following is an icon
with a link to be used
if you want to email the
survey to CUNA Mutual
Customers:
 |
|
|
Rich Woldt's RM Observations -
Underwriting RM Guidelines and
RM Performance Standards:
HUnderwriting guidelines and
performance standards should be
set not just for the UK but for
every CM market.
They should all be the same so
as to set a base point to which
every credit union and credit
union chapter with have to rise
in order to be covered without
limits or deductibles. While our
RM goal is redefine our markets
into autonomous units so we can
better predict loss experience,
we want them to march to at
least a minimum RM standard and
speak the same RM language so we
can more affectively pool/manage
their risks and more quickly
respond to their RM needs, and
more efficiently adjust claims.
For example, CMG should have one
cash item storage guideline
expressed in US dollars and with
a conversion to market currency.
This will allow actuaries to
better calcullate the potentail
loss exposure for example in a
region like the US golf. CM
losses are not only that which
is reported but they include LAE,
extra expense, etc. Adjusting
our thinking in this area will
change the RM mind-set from
telling a CU how much they can
store in a TL15 to how much they
risk losing if they don't.
|
Rich Woldt's RM Observations -
Customizing Data Sheets to Fit
the UK:
We customize data sheets so
credit unions better understand
our questions, we should stop
customizing so they'll better
understand our recommendations.
While this might benefit the
novice RM, it limits the
potential benefit of the data
sheet in that it fails to teach
a common RM language. For the
same reason NIMS was adopted to
standardize the ICS we need to
create data sheets that a CM RM
from Madison can understand a
data sheet completed by a CM RM
in postal code B25U. All CUNA
Mutual Risk Managers, and that
means all underwriters, claims
adjusters, ARMs, and back office
personnel should know a vault in
Madison is a Strong-room in
Dublin and a deposit in
Middleton is a lodgment in
Birmingham. Solution, customize
data sheets so our customers
understand terminology, but do
it in such a way that it becomes
a RM teaching tool for everyone
using the form.
This is going to be more
important as we shift from hard
copy data sheets to online RM
surveys.
|
Rich Woldt's RM Observations -
Prioritizing Risks in Ireland
and Great Britain: In 2004 we
recognized deregulation had
driven up the number of
burglary and robbery in Dublin.
Drug traffic was going up and
60% of the Dublin cab drivers
were convicted felons. Dirty
needles became the robbery MO of
choice. Our focus shifted to
encouraging teller area
"push-back" room, BR glass,
extended cues, defendable zones,
controllable crime scenes, BDA
staff training, appropriate
money safes, vaults and alarm
systems, etc. Our 2006 claims
history indicates our efforts
have paid off. Now that the
government has re-regulated the
cab industry and have a better
hold on immigration, I suspect
our claims history in Ireland
for burglary and robbery might
remain low at least for 2007.
Our RM project' focus should now
shift to our real exposures to
loss, i.e. internal and external
fraud. |
Rich Woldt's RM Observations -
Embezzlement Exposures in
Dublin:
CUNA Mutual should be very
concerned about their exposures
to embezzlement, extortion,
identity theft, fraudulent
deposit, and internet driven
crimes like phishing and
farming. Ireland,
according to David McWilliams the economist that
spoke at the WOCCU conference in
June, has a computer savvy "Me"
generation in charge of
Ireland's economy. A generation
of young upwardly mobile
capitalist driven to keep up
with the neighbor who has the
John Deere lawn tractors but no
lawn, a mortgage on an islands
in their kitchen, three cars in
four car garage, and a vacation
planned in Spain. The
point I make is this "Me"
generation sounds much like the
profile of the credit union
embezzler we talk about in our
RM workshops. This is an
embezzler who's been taught on
the internet and is ahead of the
PIN/PAN/CHIP technology before
it's on the market. (Bye the
way, predictions are PIN and
CHIP technology will only
discourage about 3% of plastic
card fraud.) This is a
generation of capitalist who've
been taught lapping was for
beginners, "pre-text-ing" is an
acceptable business practice,
and scamming is a badge of
honor. This savvy embezzler is
going to be hard to deter and
even harder to detect. Risk
Managers in 2007 should be
challenge to not only teach the
required fraud controls but
challenged to support a cultural
shift from the "Me" back to the
generation of the trusted
volunteers.
A primary RM challenge in Great
Britain and Ireland in '07 will
be to take a graying credit
union population that prefers
hand posted ledgers to internet
banking and make them
comfortable with on-line
internet RM research.
I've introduced
www.surveymonkey.com to move
RM analyses onto the internet
and
www.fraudwatchinternational.com
to encourage CUNA
Mutual and Credit Union Risk
Managers to follow. Dublin,
where 90% of CUNA Mutual's Irish
market is located is fast
becoming the economic gateway to
Europe and the financial crime
capitol of the world. RM
programs in this part of the
world need to come up to the
speed of the internet. I
recommend, focused internal and
audit control surveys be used to
identify vulnerable credit
unions and scheduled RM
"fireside chats" to leverage the
aging eyes and ears in our
market. Note: I use "fireside
chat" for lack of a better
description of getting together
in an informal setting and share
our concerns for the common
good. Politicians call them
"town meeting," business leaders
call them "business luncheons."
I see CUNA Mutual providing the
coffee and donuts and the credit
unions providing the space and
participants.
Our stated mission
in '07 should include building
partnerships for CUNA Mutual at
all levels of the credit union
movement. I see these chats as
an opportunity to do just that.
|
Rich Woldt's RM Observations
- Risk Management Fireside
Chats:
I, like the President of the US,
call them "Fireside Chats!"
Politicians call them
"Town-Meetings" and head-hunters
call them "Job-fairs." Their
purpose is to build a
relationship between two
organizations that have a common
mission. Our common mission is
to manage risks in the world
credit union movement. Our RM
goal has always been to create a
closed-loop network of Risk
Managers we can trust to manage
their risks well before they
pool them with CMG. While
conducting RM workshops and
presentations at conferences
works to a degree, experience
indicates RM information
retention and RM recommendation
implementation after these
oral/visual efforts is limited
at best. On the other hand, when
we come off stage, sit down face
to face, and share our common
concerns, we not only create an
awareness of risks, we form
meaningful RM relationships
built on trust. I see RM
fireside chats as a cost
effective way to build RM teams
at the chapter level; teams
built on trust and bonded by a
"contract of good-faith. I see
fireside chats as a much easier
format to organize at the last
minute and a venue our local RMs
can easily prepare for with a
few google searches.
I recommend a series of two hour
evening fireside chats be
scheduled at the larger credit
unions in each chapter.
Focus the evening on what credit
unions in the chapter are doing
to prepare for the looting that
occurs during a large scale
evacuation, how terrorist case
their targets and how they
extort janitors and back office
employee into being part of
identity theft scams. During the
chat, discuss what sponsors plan
to do if a pandemic wipes out
the predicted 40% of their
workforce. Or for that matter
what credit union plan to meet
the liquidity needs of victims
while controlling their
delinquencies.
Fireside chats provide CM
opportunities to bond (pun
intended) with their
market on a personal level,
manage risks they can't
avoid pooling, and identify new
CM markets and the need for new
CM products such as flood or crop
insurance, higher extra expense
limits, the need to adjust the
80% co-pay, and change WC
premium classifications.
Most
important, fireside chats offer
an opportunity to confirm credit
unions are properly equipped,
trained to handle the next
burglary, robbery or act of
violence at their credit union,
are consistently using
proper internal control and
audit controls based on their
member services.
They're much like holding a
group RMA! Almost equally
important, fireside chats
are a cost effective way to build a stronger,
more progressive market that in
turn grows new CM
opportunities. Refer to my
benchmarking reports from '04
and my recommendations on
creating a central liquidity
option in the UK to facilitate open-end borrowing,
reduce delinquencies, better
serve the liquidity needs of
members, and grow a larger more
stable CUNA Mutual market. I still think this is
the key to growing the CU
movement in Great Britain and
subsequently CUNA Mutual
marketing opportunities.
Fireside chats with
credit unions in the UK and
Ireland are a great first
step both from an RM and CMG
marketing perspective. |
Rich Woldt's RM Observations
- Market Concentration Risks:
I encourage you to read my last
assessment of CUNA Mutual's
concentration risks in South
Korea. Specifically the section
on the impact economic
disparages have on potential
loss experience. For example the
disparage between East and West
Germany when the wall went down
was 5 to 1 so when the wall
collapsed P&C losses spiraled
out of control. FYI, the
disparage between north and
south Korea is 13 to 1 at this
time and growing. Katrina proved
the economic disparage between
blocks in New Orleans made the
difference in looting, scams,
homicides, kidnapping,
vandalism, and fraud.
If my research is correct, 90%
of CUNA Mutual's Ireland market
is located in Dublin where there
is an increasing gap between the
have's and have-nots; and the
generation of volunteers
compared to the "Me" generation.
In Great Britain, CUNA Mutual's
market concentrations is along
the railroad system with the
greatest concentration in the
Greater London area. The RM
concern is, there is a predicted
10 fold increase in rail
transportation of radioactive
waste and an increased warning
from terrorists that they plan
to attack the trains in Europe
to disrupt the economy.
This is why I strongly recommend
logging and sorting credit
unions by postal code so CUNA
Mutual can identify credit
unions down-wind and within X
miles of the railroad.
Knowing the risk (toxic waste
spills) and the exposures credit
union population within X miles
of the track, Risk Managers will
be able prioritize their
fireside chats and hold them in
chapters at credit unions most
at risk.
|
Rich Woldt's RM Observations
- Security System Integration:
The best example of "security
integration" from CUNA Mutual'
RM files comes from Phoenix
Arizona where we integrated
surveillance systems within a
chapter to stop a rash or
robberies. By integrating
physical barriers to slow the
robbers, alarm systems to alert
police, surveillance systems to
trace their escape, security
guards along the route, and
responding police patrols we
were able to apprehend five
robbers (all part of the same
gang) within the first week. The
RM goal is to expand your
security perimeter and increase
the time you have to detect,
delay, and defend the target. If
you fail on the inbound, you
predict their their escape
position your surveillance
(detection technologies) and
response assets (police) to
catch them on the outbound.
I recommend "security
integration" at the chapter
level be one of the fireside
topics in 2007. |
Rich Woldt's RM Observations
- Convergence:
The RM goal of convergence is to
converge security technologies
(computer, GPS, communications,
research, etc.) so everyone can
share benefits and cross-train
personnel. For example, Allianz
has a risk tracking system that
uses GPS technology and postal
codes to identify risk and
exposure concentrations. CUNA
Mutual should design an e-based
data sheet that also stores and
sorts risk and exposure
information by postal code.
Three of the major response and
recover problems during Katrina
and on 9-11-01 had to do with
the breakdown in communication
systems. First towers for all
but Sprint went down. Second,
remaining channels quickly
clogged, and third, few
understood how to use the cell
phones to the best advantage.
Convergence means we will
identify communication links
that can be used as back-ups,
we'll write and train responding
credit unions how to use or not
use existing channels, and
position simplified instruction
manuals at predetermined sites
for use during a crisis. Note,
most law enforcement have
stopped using the 10 X 100 codes
and now use "common speak."
One fireside chat should be
devoted to the art of
communicating during a natural
disaster. Another should be on
housing-in-place and mass
evacuations, and another on
creating an on-line incident
reporting system at the chapter
level. |
|
|
|
|
|