\
 

We are all in this together! This Risk Management Workbook allow us to share our RM reasearch and "Cross-train" the RM methods we find most effective! OUR Motto? "The benefits of our combined RM efforts is greater than the benefits of our efforts working alone! That's our CUNA Mutual/Credit Union RM Advantage!

You're in Chapter VI of...     

Risk Management Learning Center

Click here to return to page 1 of this workbook!

Thank you for the opportunity to benchmark CUNA Mutual's RM programs and projects in Great Britain and Ireland.  I began benchmarking 90 days prior to landing in Birmingham with online surveys asking for input from CUNA Mutual personnel and credit unions in Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales) and Ireland (North and South). Thirty days prior to landing in Birmingham I published an online workbook we subsequently used to guide us through the benchmarking process. We assessed the administration, the tools we use to collect risk and exposure information (data sheets, memos to file, surveys, etc.), written and oral communications with CUNA Mutual customers (written reports, follow-up and telephone consultations), and the status of RM workshops and presentations (power point presentations, handouts, etc.). Chapters II of the workbook was used to teach how to conduct RM research on the internet. And, chapter V was used to roll-out CUNA Mutual's Incident Command and Control System for 2007.

I've written a separate report on my findings, to include recommended process improvements,  for chapters I (administration), III (data sheets and written reports), and IV (RM workshops and Presentations). Click on the icons below to read the workbook and a detailed report on each chapter. Per your request, I have also summarize my findings, opinions, and recommended process improvements for 2007. Because of the length of this summary, I've included an interactive table of contents you can use to navigate my reports. 

Report on I   Report on II  Report on III

 Workbook Intro Chapter I Chapter II Chapter III Chapter IV Chapter V

This year's workbook has six chapters. In Chapter I, we survey CUNA Mutual and Credit Union Risk Managers to "benchmark" our 2006 RM programs and projects. In Chapter II, we retrain and introduce alternative RM research and development (R&D) strategies for 2007. In Chapter III, we update RMA data sheets and review written reports to ensure we're supporting CM underwriting and claims personnel and our recommendations are being implemented at the credit union level. Chapter IV, we refresh our RM workshops and presentations and plan for a series of 2007 RM discussions and fireside chats with our Credit Union Risk Managers. In Chapter V, we take advanced training in CUNA Mutual's Unified Incident Command and Control System. This system adopts the "Incident Command System (ICS) and National Incident Management System (NIMS) required teaching for law enforcement, fire fighters, and emergency governments to the credit union movement. You are in Chapter VI used to file a summary report on benchmarking 2006. Use the interactive table of contents below to navigate my report. Note: I often receive significant input after I've been in country so, during the weeks following in-country benchmarking, I might be posting additional comments and conclusions to my initial reports. If so, I'll email a notice of summary updates.    Rich Woldt   

Thank you CUNA Mutual for the opportunity to benchmark your Risk Management programs and projects in Great Britain and the island of Ireland.

I thank Steve Finnigan, Gordon Bacon, and John Hamilton for their input, help and support during this benchmarking project for 2006.

Their Risk Management savvy is commendable and their administrative skills are the reason credit union' risks are so well managed in Great Britain and the island of Ireland. It was my privilege  and pleasure to work with them all again this year.            Rich Woldt

 

Interactive Table of Contents - (Point and click on topics - or point and hold down Ctrl and Click)

A benchmarking "Mission Statement" for 2996...

A report on RM projects progress...

A suggested RM project "Mission Statement" for 2007...

A suggested RM Strategic Action Plan for 2007...

The benefits of "Security Integration" and "Convergence" at the credit union and chapter levels...

Risk Management Process Improvement for 2007...

A better way to use "Cash Item Guidelines" in 2007...

A better approach to customizing data sheets...

The need to prioritize risks in Great Britain and Ireland "separately".

Why embezzlement risks in Ireland are going up, and up, and up...

Using "fireside chats" to manage risks, create opportunities, and market CM products and services...

 

Benchmarking Mission Statement December 2006:

First... I will benchmark the RM programs in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. Second...I will create a way to safely collect, securely store, and efficiently analyze RM risk and exposure information via the internet so hard copy data sheets can be eliminated. (This will allow all Risk Management personnel to enter data anytime and from anywhere. It will also allow CMG personnel in Madison Wisconsin, Birmingham England, and Dublin Ireland to simultaneously access and evaluate RMA data collected by frontline CMG personnel.) Third... I will develop an online RM manual and tutorials to facilitate RM training, cross-training, and sharing of RM research. Fourth...I will design and promote a Credit Union Unified Incident Command and Control System (CU-ICS) to teach "convergence" and promotes the formation of public-to-private partnerships needed most when a community or country is threatened by a natural disaster, terrorist attack, or pandemic. Fifth... I will organize a Credit Union Incident Response Team (CIRT) that can be used as a role-model in the credit union movement and CUNA Mutual Group. The CIRT will adhere to internationally recognized ICS and NIMS policies, procedures, and protocols. Sixth...I will submit a suggested mission statement and strategic action plan for the RM project managers at CUNA Mutual Group - International. 

 

A report on RM projects and progress - December 20, 2006:
 
This year, program administration deserves a B+  up from it's C rating in 2004. In 2006, Steve developed alternative ways to record, store and analyze risk and exposure information. For example, he now uses his digital camera to photograph safes, vaults, and alarm components and plans to get a video cell phone next year. He's also created a number of excel spread sheets and email puddles to measure burglary and robbery risks at each credit union in the Great Britain and Ireland.

On the downside, most on-site RM analysis done in 2006 focused on burglary and robbery, and not on the internal control, fidelity, forgery or fraudulent deposit analyses. While burglary and especially robbery will continue to need regular attention, in my opinion, CUNA Mutual's next big claim will be an embezzlement claim coming out of Ireland. I strongly recommend Steve quickly train John to do the internal control, fidelity, forgery and fraudulent deposit analyses and make those the focus during 2007. Needless to say, in Dublin especially we need to continue talking about the risk of robbery.  

CUNA Mutual's RM project budgets followed the same program development model used by the Department of Homeland Security and emergency governments. In '03 and "04 we focused on getting appropriate physical, alarm, surveillance, and access security in place based on the cash item exposures in each bonded credit union. Our presentations focused on basic RM principles and methods (Identify, Measure, Control, - Avoid, Reduce, Spread, Assume, and Transfer to CUNA Mutual). In '05 and '06 we focused on training a cadre of CUNA Mutual and Credit Union Risk Managers in each CUNA Mutual market. RM disciplines we taught included creating controllable crime scenes, defendable zones, contingency planning, business resumption, succession management and integrating security systems. In my opinion, these CUNA Mutual RM projects have been focused and "right on target!"

 
In 2007, the operative RM discipline will be system "Convergence" and the strategy will be creating RM partnerships at all levels of the credit union movement and public-to-private partnerships at the local and regional levels.  Without a doubt forming public-to-private RM  partnerships has recommended RM solution at every conference on natural disasters, terrorism and pandemics. We've learned all three can devestate an economy.

 

Suggested Risk Management Mission Statements for 2007

In 2007 we will... move from hard copy data sheets to e-based data sheets so they can be more easily accessed by authorized CMG personnel to include Madison Wisconsin based underwriters and claims personnel. We will.. maintain RM files by postal codes and transmit survey data using "key" codes to enhance security. We will... promote the latest RM methods to include security integration and convergence at the credit union, chapter, regional, country, and international levels. We will... write a CMG Incident Command and Control response and recovery plan and form a CUNA Mutual/Credit Union Incident Response Team (CIRT) for the Midland East and Midland West credit union chapters that serve credit unions in the Birmingham England and surrounding area and the chapters that serve credit unions in the Greater London area.

 

Suggested Risk Management Strategic Action Plans for 2007

Strategic Action Plans for 2007 should include the following:

  • During January, create excel spread sheets logging credit unions by postal code, bond contract number, ID #, and column for a key code!
  • During first quarter, customize www.surveymonkey.com customer surveys for England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland!
  • During first quarter, create a two hour RM program to be used during a "fireside" chat session on the CU-ICS!
  • During the second quarter, create customer surveys to replace the burglary, robbery, internal control, forgery, and fidelity risk analyses.
  • During the second quarter, create an RM R&D library of web sites for doing postal code specific crime analysis. Cross train CMG personnel on how to use the internet to create current statistics for chapter presentations.
  • During the second quarter, use the chapters around Birmingham as a template to create a CU-ICS!
  • During the second quarter, organize a CIRT for the two chapters serving the Birmingham area. 
  • Conduct a series of "fireside" chats on a chapter basis during the second and third quarter so to be ready for benchmarking during the first week of November each year.
  • Introduce "convergence" and "security integration" at the chapter level..
Above:  Steve Finnigan and Isabel Shakespeare, General Manager of CitySave Credit Union at 16 Waterloo Street in Birmingham England B25U, discuss the evacuation plans recommended by the City of Birmingham authorities.

Above - Right:  Isabel Shakespeare explains to Steve how her chapter (Midland East?) and Steve's chapter (Midland West?) compare to the evacuation plan recommended by Birmingham authorities. Go to www.birminghamalert.co.uk for an excellent example of city emergency government web sites. Note how the ABCUL web site at www.abcul.org and the Citysave CU at www.citysave.org.uk use postal codes to track locations and maping.  Combining such web sites using postal codes would be an example of "convergence." Creating a "unified" credit union incident command to evacuate Birmingham using one of the many GPS programs is another example of "convergence."                                                                                                                                                                                                  Rich Woldt

 
The Incident Command System provides an ideal template for teaching Risk Management.  For example, the Operations Chief forms burglary, robbery, fire, and medical emergency teams and teach them to assess credit union operational risks. The Planning Chief teaches contingency planning, the Logistics Chief teaches site security, how to create controllable crime scenes and defendable zones, and the Finance Chief teaches how to establish and consistently adhere to proper internal, audit, and collection controls. Staging area managers teach how to set up and manage responding resources. The Safety officer is one of the most important positions. He/she makes sure that credit union personnel are properly equipped and trained before being deployed to the hot zone. The Information officer makes sure the credit union speaks with one voice and the Liaison Officer makes sure no one gets lost in the confusion. Oh yes! The Incident Commander teaches how to take command and control over an incident that left alone will spiral out of control.             Rich Woldt
The Credit Union Incident Command System (CU-ICS) is staffed by a trained "Credit Union Incident Response Team" (CIRTs). You's called up by the Incident Commander will depend on the type, scope, and duration, of the incident. Who takes part depends on who's willing, able, trained and prepared to respond. Click here for a tutorial on forming your CIRT...

  

Risk Management Process Improvement for 2007:

Risk Management Process Improvement for 2007 - The Benefits from Benchmarking 2006

Benchmarking in December 2006 confirmed CUNA Mutual is on target based on past RM mission statements, AIMs, and strategic action plans. However, there is an urgent need to increase the speed at which Risk Managers are doing their RM research and development of new RM methods specifically in the area of internet fraud, internal dishonesty/embezzlement, organized crime to include gang MOs, and the known terrorist threats to disrupt regional economies. There is also an urgent need to adjust the focus of on-site risk assessments so more attention is given to embezzlement, external frauds, scams, internet crimes including phishing at credit unions during mergers, and risks associated with the new liquidity management tools being introduced in Great Britain and Ireland, i.e. debit and/or credit cards. There is also an urgent need to introduce a CU  Incident Management System at the credit union and chapter levels to reduce losses that escalate during and after a natural disaster. Risk Management Analysis need to be converted from hard copy to an internet based system that's properly secured so it can be sorted, analyzed, and shared with any authorized CMG underwriter, claims adjuster, account relationship manager, and Risk Manager.

Implementing the recommendations in this report will..

  • Expand the cadre of CUNA Mutual Risk Managers in Great Britain and Ireland from two (Steve Finnigan and John Hamilton) to two plus all CUNA Mutual personnel serving this market.
  • Provide 2007 Risk Managers with 24/7 internet access so they'll be able to access risk analysis data sheets, customer surveys, and excel spread sheets set up to sort, identify, and measure risks by postal code. Click here for a sample survey and click here for a sample survey assessment tool. If these links don't work try the colored icons below or in chapter I of the workbook.
  • CUNA Mutual Risk Managers in 2007 will be able to submit risk and exposure information as well as incident reports from any where at any time via the internet.
  • CUNA Mutual' underwriters, claims personnel, Risk Managers, and project supervisors will be able to obtain the most current risk and exposure information on file at the moment.
  • Once risk and exposure information has been logged onto excel spread sheets, Risk Managers will be able to focus their RM workshops, presentations, and fireside chats where CUNA Mutual has the greatest exposure concentrations.
  • In summary, implementing process improvements from benchmarking 2006 will make CUNA Mutual RM programs and projects more affective, more efficient, and more focused on the best interest of the credit union movement in Great Britain and Ireland.
  • CUNA Mutual Team Benchmarking Survey 2006  This survey is for CUNA Mutual support personnel or those who need to rely on back office RM project record keeping! Following is an icon with a link to be used if you want to email the survey to CUNA Mutual personnel.  CUNA Mutual Team Benchmarking e-Survey 2006
    This survey is for CUNA Mutual Account Representatives, CUNA Mutual Risk Managers, CUNA Mutual Underwriters, and CUNA Mutual Claims Personnel. It's purpose is to determine how beneficial RMA data sheets and written reports have been to you during 2006.
    CUNA Mutual RM Customer Survey 2006   This survey is for CUNA Mutual customers to include bond holders and those who CUNA Mutual Risk Managers partnered with during 2006. Following is an icon with a link to be used if you want to email the survey to CUNA Mutual Customers: CUNA Mutual RM Customer e-Survey 2006
     

 

Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Underwriting RM Guidelines and RM Performance Standards: HUnderwriting guidelines and performance standards should be set not just for the UK but for every CM market. They should all be the same so as to set a base point to which every credit union and credit union chapter with have to rise in order to be covered without limits or deductibles. While our RM goal is redefine our markets into autonomous units so we can better predict loss experience, we want them to march to at least a minimum RM standard and speak the same RM language so we can more affectively pool/manage their risks and more quickly respond to their RM needs, and more efficiently adjust claims. For example, CMG should have one cash item storage guideline expressed in US dollars and with a conversion to market currency. This will allow actuaries to better calcullate the potentail loss exposure for example in a region like the US golf. CM losses are not only that which is reported but they include LAE, extra expense, etc. Adjusting our thinking in this area will change the RM mind-set from telling a CU how much they can store in a TL15 to how much they risk losing if they don't. 
Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Customizing Data Sheets to Fit the UK: We customize data sheets so credit unions better understand our questions, we should stop customizing so they'll better understand our recommendations. While this might benefit the novice RM, it limits the potential benefit of the data sheet in that it fails to teach a common RM language. For the same reason NIMS was adopted to standardize the ICS we need to create data sheets that a CM RM from Madison can understand a data sheet completed by a CM RM in postal code B25U. All CUNA Mutual Risk Managers, and that means all underwriters, claims adjusters, ARMs, and back office personnel should know a vault in Madison is a Strong-room in Dublin and a deposit in Middleton is a lodgment in Birmingham. Solution, customize data sheets so our customers understand terminology, but do it in such a way that it becomes a RM teaching tool for everyone using the form. This is going to be more important as we shift from hard copy data sheets to online RM surveys.
Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Prioritizing Risks in Ireland and Great Britain: In 2004 we recognized deregulation had driven up the number of  burglary and robbery in Dublin. Drug traffic was going up and 60% of the Dublin cab drivers were convicted felons. Dirty needles became the robbery MO of choice. Our focus shifted to encouraging teller area "push-back" room, BR glass, extended cues, defendable zones, controllable crime scenes, BDA staff training, appropriate money safes, vaults and alarm systems, etc. Our 2006 claims history indicates our efforts have paid off. Now that the government has re-regulated the cab industry and have a better hold on immigration, I suspect our claims history in Ireland for burglary and robbery might remain low at least for 2007. Our RM project' focus should now shift to our real exposures to loss, i.e. internal and external fraud.
Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Embezzlement Exposures in Dublin: CUNA Mutual should be very concerned about their exposures to embezzlement, extortion, identity theft, fraudulent deposit, and internet driven crimes like phishing and farming.  Ireland, according to David McWilliams the economist that spoke at the WOCCU conference in June, has a computer savvy "Me" generation in charge of Ireland's economy. A generation of young upwardly mobile capitalist driven to keep up with the neighbor who has the John Deere lawn tractors but no lawn, a mortgage on an islands in their kitchen, three cars in four car garage, and a vacation planned in Spain.  The point I make is this "Me" generation sounds much like the profile of the credit union embezzler we talk about in our RM workshops. This is an embezzler who's been taught on the internet and is ahead of the PIN/PAN/CHIP technology before it's on the market. (Bye the way, predictions are PIN and CHIP technology will only discourage about 3% of plastic card fraud.)  This is a generation of capitalist who've been taught lapping was for beginners, "pre-text-ing" is an acceptable business practice, and scamming is a badge of honor. This savvy embezzler is going to be hard to deter and even harder to detect. Risk Managers in 2007 should be challenge to not only teach the required fraud controls but challenged to support a cultural shift from the "Me" back to the generation of the trusted volunteers.

A primary RM challenge in Great Britain and Ireland in '07 will be to take a graying credit union population that prefers hand posted ledgers to internet banking and make them comfortable with on-line internet RM research. I've introduced www.surveymonkey.com to move RM analyses onto the internet and www.fraudwatchinternational.com  to encourage CUNA Mutual and Credit Union Risk Managers to follow. Dublin, where 90% of CUNA Mutual's Irish market is located is fast becoming the economic gateway to Europe and the financial crime capitol of the world. RM programs in this part of the world need to come up to the speed of the internet. I recommend, focused internal and audit control surveys be used to identify vulnerable credit unions and scheduled RM "fireside chats" to leverage the aging eyes and ears in our market. Note: I use "fireside chat" for lack of a better description of getting together in an informal setting and share our concerns for the common good. Politicians call them "town meeting," business leaders call them "business luncheons." I see CUNA Mutual providing the coffee and donuts and the credit unions providing the space and participants. Our stated mission in '07 should include building partnerships for CUNA Mutual at all levels of the credit union movement. I see these chats as an opportunity to do just that. 

Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Risk Management Fireside Chats: I, like the President of the US, call them "Fireside Chats!" Politicians call them "Town-Meetings" and head-hunters call them "Job-fairs." Their purpose is to build a relationship between two organizations that have a common mission. Our common mission is to manage risks in the world credit union movement. Our RM goal has always been to create a closed-loop network of Risk Managers we can trust to manage their risks well before they pool them with CMG. While conducting RM workshops and presentations at conferences works to a degree, experience indicates RM information retention and RM recommendation implementation after these oral/visual efforts is limited at best. On the other hand, when we come off stage, sit down face to face, and share our common concerns, we not only create an awareness of risks, we form meaningful RM relationships built on trust. I see RM fireside chats as a cost effective way to build RM teams at the chapter level; teams built on trust and bonded by a "contract of good-faith. I see fireside chats as a much easier format to organize at the last minute and a venue our local RMs can easily prepare for with a few google searches.

I recommend a series of two hour evening fireside chats be scheduled at the larger credit unions in each chapter. Focus the evening on what credit unions in the chapter are doing to prepare for the looting that occurs during a large scale evacuation, how terrorist case their targets and how they extort janitors and back office employee into being part of identity theft scams. During the chat, discuss what sponsors plan to do if a pandemic wipes out the predicted 40% of their workforce. Or for that matter what credit union plan to meet the liquidity needs of victims while controlling their delinquencies.

Fireside chats provide CM opportunities to bond (pun intended) with their market on a personal level, manage risks they can't avoid pooling, and identify new CM markets and the need for new CM products such as flood or crop insurance, higher extra expense limits, the need to adjust the 80% co-pay, and change WC premium classifications. Most important, fireside chats offer an opportunity to confirm credit unions are properly equipped, trained to handle the next burglary, robbery or act of violence at their credit union, are consistently using proper internal control and audit controls based on their member services. They're much like holding a group RMA!  Almost equally important, fireside chats are a cost effective way to build a stronger, more progressive market that in turn grows new CM opportunities. Refer to my benchmarking reports from '04 and my recommendations on creating a central liquidity option in the UK to facilitate open-end borrowing, reduce delinquencies, better serve the liquidity needs of members, and grow a larger more stable CUNA Mutual market. I still think this is the key to growing the CU movement in Great Britain and subsequently CUNA Mutual marketing opportunities. Fireside chats with credit unions in the UK and Ireland are a great first step both from an RM and CMG marketing perspective.

Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Market Concentration Risks: I encourage you to read my last assessment of CUNA Mutual's concentration risks in South Korea. Specifically the section on the impact economic disparages have on potential loss experience. For example the disparage between East and West Germany when the wall went down was 5 to 1 so when the wall collapsed P&C losses spiraled out of control. FYI, the disparage between north and south Korea is 13 to 1 at this time and growing. Katrina proved the economic disparage between blocks in New Orleans made the difference in looting, scams, homicides, kidnapping, vandalism, and fraud.

If my research is correct, 90% of CUNA Mutual's Ireland market is located in Dublin where there is an increasing gap between the have's and have-nots; and the generation of volunteers compared to the "Me" generation. In Great Britain, CUNA Mutual's market concentrations is along the railroad system with the greatest concentration in the Greater London area. The RM concern is, there is a predicted 10 fold increase in rail transportation of radioactive waste and an increased warning from terrorists that they plan to attack the trains in Europe to disrupt the economy.

This is why I strongly recommend logging and sorting credit unions by postal code so CUNA Mutual can identify credit unions down-wind and within X miles of the railroad. Knowing the risk (toxic waste spills) and the exposures credit union population within X miles of the track, Risk Managers will be able prioritize their fireside chats and hold them in chapters at credit unions most at risk.   

Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Security System Integration:  The best example of "security integration" from CUNA Mutual' RM files comes from Phoenix Arizona where we integrated surveillance systems within a chapter to stop a rash or robberies. By integrating physical barriers to slow the robbers, alarm systems to alert police, surveillance systems to trace their escape, security guards along the route, and responding police patrols we were able to apprehend five robbers (all part of the same gang) within the first week. The RM goal is to expand your security perimeter and increase the time you have to detect, delay, and defend the target. If you fail on the inbound, you predict their their escape position your surveillance (detection technologies) and response assets (police) to catch them on the outbound. I recommend "security integration" at the chapter level be one of the fireside topics in 2007.
Rich Woldt's RM Observations - Convergence:  The RM goal of convergence is to converge security technologies (computer, GPS, communications, research, etc.) so everyone can share benefits and cross-train personnel. For example, Allianz has a risk tracking system that uses GPS technology and postal codes to identify risk and exposure concentrations. CUNA Mutual should design an e-based data sheet that also stores and sorts risk and exposure information by postal code. Three of the major response and recover problems during Katrina and on 9-11-01 had to do with the breakdown in communication systems. First towers for all but Sprint went down. Second, remaining channels quickly clogged, and third, few understood how to use the cell phones to the best advantage. Convergence means we will identify communication links that can be used as back-ups, we'll write and train responding credit unions how to use or not use existing channels, and position simplified instruction manuals at predetermined sites for use during a crisis. Note, most law enforcement have stopped using the 10 X 100 codes and now use "common speak."  One fireside chat should be devoted to the art of communicating during a natural disaster. Another should be on housing-in-place and mass evacuations, and another on creating an on-line incident reporting system at the chapter level.